|
WHAT
PRESBYTERIANS BELIEVE ABOUT ANGELS
|
What
are angels?
The
word “angel” comes from the Greek word angelos
(άγγελος), which
means “messenger.” So, as the word
implies, angels are messengers of God.
|
|
What
do angels look like?
Angels
are traditionally regarded as immaterial beings; and
thus an artistic problem arose as to how to give
visual expression to these spiritual beings.
Adhering to the prohibition of the second
commandment, early Christianity did not represent
angels in visual art forms.
You
shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the
form of anything that is in heaven above, that is on
the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the
earth. (Exodus 20:4)
However,
in 787 AD, the Second Council of Nicea decided that
it was lawful to represent angels in visual art
forms. Thus, in early Christian art, angels
were patterned after the old Greek goddess Nike (Νίκη),
the winged goddess of victory, and after the old
Roman god Cupid, the winged god of erotic love.
This depiction of angels continued into the Middle
Ages.
During
the Middle Ages, angels were also considered to be
both beautiful and sexless. Thus, they were
portrayed as boyish and were androgynous in
appearance. For the sake of medieval modesty,
angels were clothed in flowing garments which
covered their feet.
The
scholastic theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas (1226-1274
AD), reasoned that, as divine messengers, angels
were pure intelligences and were not united to
bodies. And, given that intelligence resides
in the head, certain angelic beings were often
represented from the late Middle Ages onward simply
as heads with wings.
|
|
Are
there different kinds of angels?
From
numerous references in Scripture, it was deduced
during antiquity that there are many kinds
of angels. These angelic beings are referred
to in Scripture by many titles and phrases.
Men
— Genesis 18:1-8;Genesis
32:24;Mark 16:5
Sons
of God
—
Genesis 6:1-4
Seraphim
— Isaiah 6:2-3
Cherubim
— Genesis 3:24
Thrones
— Colossians 1:16
Dominions
— Colossians 1:16
Powers
— Romans 8:37-39;Ephesians
3:10-11;Colossians 1:16
Principalities
— Romans 8:37-39;Ephesians
3:10-11;Colossians 1:16
Archangels
— 1 Thessalonians
4:16;Jude 9
Legends
of an angelic hierarchy arose as many theologians of
the early church attempted to classify angels
according to Biblical references. The most
influential ordering was expounded by Pseudo-Dionysius
in the Celestial
Hierarchies.
According
to the Celestial
Hierarchies, angels were classified into
nine choirs, grouped into three hierarchies.
1st
Hierarchy:
Counselors
1st Choir:
Seraphim
2nd Choir:
Cherubim
3rd Choir:
Thrones
2nd
Hierarchy:
Governors of the
Stars and the Elements
4th Choir:
Dominions (or
Dominations)
5th Choir:
Virtues
6th Choir:
Powers
3rd
Hierarchy:
Messengers
7th Choir:
Principalities
(or Princedoms)
8th Choir:
Archangels
9th Choir:
Angels
|
|
Do
angels have Gender?
In
the Bible, the word “men” is sometimes used when
referring to messengers from God. Also the
pronoun “he” is often used when referring to
angels. These references may imply that angels
have a masculine gender, or they may simply be a
linguistic convenience to personalize these
spiritual beings who are otherwise sexless.
However,
there is a rather enigmatic reference to the gender
of angels in Genesis chapter six. In this
reference, angels are said to have a relationship
with humankind which is more carnal in nature than
spiritual. This reference still puzzles
Biblical scholars to this day.
When
people began to multiply on the face of the ground,
and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw
that they were fair; and they took wives for
themselves of all that they chose. Then the Lord
said, ‘My spirit shall not abide in mortals for
ever, for they are flesh; their days shall be one
hundred and twenty years.’ The Nephilim were on
the earth in those days—and also afterwards—when
the sons of God went in to the daughters of humans,
who bore children to them. These were the heroes
that were of old, warriors of renown.
(Genesis 6:1-4)
From
this Biblical passage, the gender of angels is
implied in that they have sexual relations with
human women. The result of this mating is a
race called the Nephilim.
[“Nephilim” (נפלים)
in some English Bibles is translated as
“giants,” but its literal meaning in Hebrew is
“fallen ones.”] This Biblical account does
not explain at all who these “heroes of old”
(these “warriors of renown”) are. But, the
story does imply that God is not pleased with this
mating—God does not apparently like the idea of
mixing the angelic ream with the earthly realm.
|
|
How
Many Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Pin?
During
the middle ages, the subject of angels became a
focal point of intense theological scrutiny.
Medieval theologians sought to unlock the mysteries
of the nature of angels. Believing that angels
were residents of the celestial (heavenly) realm,
they theorized that they were composed of a
mysterious substance called “subtle matter.”
Such contemplations led to seemingly absurd
questions such as, “How many angels can dance on
the head of a pin?” But, as absurd as this
question might sound to our modern ears, this was
actually an important issue in the middle ages when
one is dealing with the properties of “subtle
matter” and its relationship to earthly matter.
Behind such questions is a more philosophical
question—“what is the relationship between
spiritual reality and physical reality?”
This
deeper question still captivates the minds of
Christians today. Today we tend to think of
physical things as occupying time and space—there
is a certain place where a physical thing is and
where it is not—there is a certain interval of
time when a physical thing exists and when it does
not exist. But, we tend to think of spiritual
things as not being contained by space and
time—they can be anywhere and everywhere at the
same time—they can exist now and eternally
wherever they may be. Effectively, then,
spiritual reality and physical reality are beyond
comparison.
So,
how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
If we responded, “All of them,” the answer would
be correct. But, if we responded, “None of
them,” the answer would be just as correct.
|
|
What
are Guardian Angels?
There
are many persons today (both Christians and
non-Christians) who believe that angels from God
watch over individuals protecting them from harm and
guiding them toward prosperity and happiness.
This
idea of guardian angels was first popularized by the
medieval scholastic theologian St. Thomas Aquinas.
Based on influences from Islamic theology (in which
guardian angels play a significant role), Aquinas
delineates their roles for Christianity.
Thereafter, his notion of guardian angels was a
basic component of the Christian tradition.
The archangel Raphael (from the apocryphal book of
Tobit) became the archetype of this medieval notion
of guardian angels.
Aquinas
conceived of guardian angels as a powerful spiritual
presence. He believed that there were guardian
angels not only of individuals, but also of families
and of nations. These angels would guide
persons through threshold experiences and through
life’s rites of passage. In particular, such
angels are present at the end of life to guide
individuals through the threshold of death into the
celestial levels of heaven.
|
|
Are
angels good or evil?
Angels
have traditionally been depicted as having the
freedom to make moral choices. The Apostles
Paul implies that angels are free to choose between
right and wrong in that they must face judicial
supervision.
Do
you not know that we are to judge angels—to say
nothing of ordinary matters?
(1 Corinthians 6:3)
Those
who have chosen goodness and to abide in the grace
of God are those who continuously abide in a state
of grace. These are conventionally called
“angels” as a collective term for all celestial
beings who have chosen God’s goodness.
Now,
those angelic beings who have chosen evil and to
rebel against the grace of God are those who have
been expelled from Heaven and are condemned to
eternal damnation. These are conventionally
called “demons” as a collective term for all
angels who have chosen to reject God’s sovereignty
and grace.
God
did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them
to hell, putting them into gloomy dungeons to be
held for judgment. (2
Peter 2:4)
|
|
Do
angels have names?
Among
the sixty-six books of the Bible, only two angels
are named: Gabriel and Michael. If we consider
the apocryphal books to be among the Old Testament
writings, then we find the name of a third angel
(Raphael) in the Book of Tobit.
Gabriel
(גבריאל),
which in Hebrew means “God is my strength,”
appears in the Book of Daniel as one who comes to
aid the prophet in understanding his apocalyptic
vision (Daniel 8:15-18, 9:20-21). Gabriel also
appears in the Gospel of Luke as the angel of the
annunciation (Luke 1:26-38). According to
Jewish lore, Gabriel is the angel who rained down
death and destruction upon the sinful cities of
Sodom
and
Gomorrah
(Genesis 19). According to Islamic tradition,
it was the angel Gabriel (Jibril
in Arabic) who dictated the Koran to Mohammed.
And, according to Christian lore, Gabriel is
one of the highest-ranking angels—second only to
Michael.
Michael
(מיכאל),
which in Hebrew means “who is like God,” appears
in the Book of Revelation as the archangel who casts
Satan and his malevolent angels out of heaven
(Revelation 12:7-9). According to Jewish lore,
Michael contended with Satan over the burial of
Moses’ body [this legend is alluded to in the New
Testament (Jude 9)]. Another Jewish legend
asserts that the fire which Moses saw in the burning
bush was the angel Michael. According to
Islamic lore, Michael (Mika’il
in Arabic) resides in the 7th heaven
where he implores the pardon of God. And,
according to Christian lore, Michael is the
highest-ranking angel.
Raphael
(רפאל),
which in Hebrew means “God has healed,” appears
in the apocryphal Book of Tobit as companion and
guide to Tobit’s son Tobias who journeys from
Media to
Nineveh
. It is only at the end of the journey when
Raphael reveals himself by name as one of the seven
holy angels (Tobit 12:11-15). According to
Jewish lore, Raphael (as his name implies) is
credited with healing Abraham of the pain of
circumcision (Genesis 17:24) and with curing Jacob
of the injury to his thigh after wrestling with an
adversary at Peniel (Genesis 32:22-32). And,
according to Christian lore, Raphael is one of the
highest-ranking angels—surpassed only by Michael
and Gabriel.
Now,
some have claimed that another angel (albeit, an
evil being) is named in the pages of Scripture:
Satan—the fallen angel. But, the word
“Satan” is not actually a proper name; rather,
it is the role or function of this angel.
|
|
Who
is Satan?
The
name “Satan” comes from the English
transliteration of the Hebrew word satan
(שטן)
whose literal meaning is “adversary” or
“accuser.” In the Old Testament books of
Job and Zechariah, the figure of Satan is depicted
as a member of God’s council whose basic duty it
was to “accuse” human beings before God.
In these books, the word “Satan” is written with
the definite article “the” (השטן).
Thus, these passages are not referring to
“Satan” as a proper name but as a role or office
(“the accuser”). A more accurate
translation in these passages would be “the
Satan” or “the adversary.”
One
day the heavenly beings came to present themselves
before the Lord,
and Satan also came among them.
(Job 1:6)
Then
he showed me the high priest Joshua standing before
the angel of the Lord,
and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him.
(Zechariah 3:1)
By
the time of the New Testament, “Satan” is the
traditional name of that angel who is regarded as
God’s archenemy and as the personification of
evil. Satan is regarded as the leader of a
host of malevolent angels or demons. By
tradition, Satan was cast out of heaven because of
his rebellion against God and because of his desire
to assume the prerogatives of divinity. This
tradition is reflected in New Testament passages
such as Luke 10:18 and Revelation 12:7-9.
|
|
Is
Satan the same as the Devil?
In
most English translations of the Bible, Satan is the
same supernatural being as the Devil. The word
“devil” is the English translation of the Greek
word diabolos
(διάβολος)
meaning “accuser.” Diabolos
is used in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of
the Old Tesatment) to translate the Hebrew word satan
(שטן).
In the New Testament, diabolos
is used as a virtual synonym for the Greek
transliteration Satanas
(Σαταναος),
translated in English as “Satan.”
And
war broke out in heaven; Michael and his angels
fought against the dragon. The dragon and his
angels fought back, but they were defeated, and
there was no longer any place for them in heaven.
The great dragon was thrown down, that ancient
serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the
deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to
the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
(Revelation 12:7-9)
Then
I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in
his hand the key to the bottomless pit and a great
chain. He seized the dragon, that ancient
serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him
for a thousand years.
(Revelation 20:1-2)
However,
in the King James Version (KJV), the words
“Satan” and “devil” are not always
synonymous. When the KJV was published (1611
AD), the word “devil” was regularly employed as
a translation of another Greek word, daimon
(δαίμων). But,
by the time that the Revised Standard Version (RSV)
is published, daimon
is translated as “demon.”
|
|
Is
“Lucifer” another name for Satan?
The
English word “Lucifer” comes from the Latin for
“light bearer.” The word “Lucifer” is
the translation in the King James Version (KJV) of
Isaiah 14:12 for the Hebrew word helel
(הילל)
which means “morning star” or “day star.”
Helel
refers to the planet Venus (the third brightest
object in the night sky) and is an apparent
reference to deities of the ancient Near East.
In
Isaiah 14:12, the prophet refers to the tyrannical
king of
Babylon
with the taunting title of “Day Star, Son of
Dawn.” Isaiah ironically refers to this
tyrant with an exalted title because the Babylonian
king has fallen from his lofty position of power as
did the deities of ancient Canaanite mythology.
How
art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the
morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which
didst weaken the nations!
(Isaiah 14:12 – KJV)
How
you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn!
How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the
nations low! (Isaiah
14:12 – NRSV)
In
the Christian church, this passage from Isaiah came
to be connected with Jesus’ saying in Luke’s
Gospel:
“I
saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.”
(Luke 10:18)
Thus,
the connection was made (erroneously) between
Lucifer and Satan, and Lucifer was popularly
understood as another name for Satan.
|
|
Is
Satan responsible for evil?
Occasionally,
a person might try to account for immoral behavior
by declaring, “The Devil made me do it!”
But, we believe that blaming the Devil for our
actions is nothing other than an attempt to disavow
our responsibility as agents of evil.
Although
Presbyterians do not doubt the existence of Satan,
we do not believe the claim that Satan forces
persons to inflict suffering upon the rest of
creation. Each person is accountable to God
for his or her own actions. Satan is not to
blame. Satan cannot make persons evil.
This fallen angel does not have power in himself to
corrupt God’s creation. Creation was not
placed under Satan’s dominion, but under the
dominion of humankind.
Then
God said, “Let us make humankind in our image,
according to our likeness; and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all
wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creeps upon the earth.” (Genesis
1:26)
So,
if Satan does not cause persons to do evil things,
what role does Satan play in the world’s ills?
We
believe that Satan has no inherent power over us.
The only power which he has is that power which we
give him over us. Satan is often called “the
Tempter” because he represents those temptations
which entice us to act in ways contrary to God’s
goodness. These temptations cannot make us do
evil, but they can make evil things seem good to us.
Temptations are not inherently evil, but yielding to
them is.
So, whenever we choose to give in to the enticement
of temptation, we are giving life and form to evil.
In other words, we are imbuing Satan with power over
us which he did not inherently have.
|
|